In the current political landscape of Pakistan, a small group of senators has fervently advocated for the postponement of the upcoming elections, citing adverse weather conditions and an upsurge in terrorism as compelling reasons. However, the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) has responded to this push with unyielding determination, asserting that all necessary arrangements have been meticulously completed, and it is not advisable to delay the polls. The resolution put forth by Senator Dilawar Khan, despite passing through the house with sparse attendance, has been met with skepticism by the ECP, which rightly points out that both general elections and local government polls have been successfully conducted during winter conditions in the past. This firm stance by the ECP ideally should put to rest all uncertainties surrounding the Elections 2024.

Unfortunately, the circumstances leading up to the February elections are far from ideal. The paramount question looming over the elections pertains to the credibility, legitimacy, and transparency of the electoral process. A recent Supreme Court verdict stripping the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) of its bat symbol has further complicated matters. Former PTI chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan has voiced concerns that the PTI, now compelled to field independent candidates, may be susceptible to increased horse-trading. The party’s decision to withdraw its petition seeking contempt proceedings against the ECP, ostensibly due to a lack of confidence in Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa’s court, has added a layer of complexity to the situation, raising questions about the state of both politics and justice. The predicament faced by the PTI is not unique, as legal experts and rights activists have joined the chorus of skepticism surrounding the upcoming elections. The disenfranchisement of a significant voter class and imbalanced targeting of candidates during the nomination process are serious concerns that cannot be overlooked. The withdrawal of petitions and the perceived lack of confidence in judicial proceedings only serve to erode public trust in the fairness and transparency of the electoral system.

While some political observers express optimism for the PTI, acknowledging its decision not to boycott the elections and its substantial vote bank, challenges abound in the political landscape. Fears have been raised that, post-elections, PTI candidates winning seats as independents may lack party discipline and could freely join other political entities without facing repercussions under the defection clause. The party’s inability to secure reserved seats due to the ‘independent’ status of its candidates raises questions about its participation in the upcoming Senate polls post-general elections. These are critical questions that, in any democratic setup, should be disconcerting.

It is imperative for the Election Commission of Pakistan to ensure that the forthcoming elections are not a mere facade to check a procedural box. A functional government, legitimately elected, devoid of constant protests and legal disputes, is essential for the stability and progress of the nation. Achieving this requires fair and free elections, and the ECP must play a pivotal role in upholding these democratic principles.